This means that in 2016, for example, 7.85% of the UK's total foreign aid budget (ODA), which totalled 13,348m (pdf) that year, was spent on climate-related projects. The UK uses data on ODA spend by sector and country/region which is reported by each multilateral organisation to the OECD DAC to estimate what percentage of DFID and UK core contributions are spent in each country and sector. DCMSs Cultural Protection Fund supports developing countries, mainly in Middle Eastern conflict zones, to protect and restore their cultural heritage. This was the largest year-on-year increase compared to the other income groups, 43.0% of spend within this category consists of project-type interventions and includes expenditure on multi-country or multi-region projects. The Prosperity Fund is an innovative cross-government fund, focused on Official Development Assistance (ODA) eligible middle income countries and emerging economies. These non-DFID sources account for around 29.6% in 2019 and are largely derived from financial transaction data. The final ODA data and an updated GNI estimate for 2019 released by the ONS in June have been used to calculate the final ODA:GNI ratio in this publication and to report to the OECD. The DAC publish detailed information of the multilaterals country and sector spending in December. While FCDO will manage its own spending on ODA, FCDO has no control over GNI nor the spending by other government departments and other sources of ODA. A new report from the cross-party Commons international development committee of MPs hits out at the use of the Foreign . Figure 11: Breakdown of UK 2019 bilateral ODA by Type of Aid. The report finds that, partly as a result, in 2021 UK bilateral aid spending in least developed countries (LDCs) decreased to 1.4bn, which represented about 12% of the aid budget. FCDO is responsible for collating data and reporting spend on ODA to the Organisation of Economic Development and Co-operation (OECD), including the 0.7% ODA:GNI ratio commitment. This section covers ODA spend from the FCOs core budget. Delivery of leadership and tax audit training to tax administration officials from developing countries. [2] China's Belt and Road Initiative (BRI)announced in 2013is the flagship under which China has made hundreds of pledges to support different countries and . This could have an impact on the recent trends of some recipient countries. The United States is by far the largest single foreign donor. In dark blue is the 2019 ODA:GNI ratio and in grey is 2018 ratio. HMT ODA relates to a core contribution to the Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank (AIIB) and development-related administrative costs. Multilateral funding, by Government Departments and other contributors[footnote 20]. It shows: Figure 18: Map of the top 15 highest recipients of total DAC Members bilateral ODA Spend and UKs Share by Country, 2018. In 2019 the Foreign & Commonwealth Office (FCO) used ODA from its core departmental budget and the Joint Funds (Conflict, Stability and Security Fund, and Prosperity Fund) to support and deliver the strategic objectives of the governments 2015 Aid Strategy and support delivery of the UNs Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). Since 1970, the UN has set a target for donor countries to contribute 0.7% of their GNI to foreign aid. To get a sense of relative magnitude, Russian disbursements in 2015 amounted to roughly half of Italian aid that year. Figure 17 shows ODA spend as a proportion of gross national income (GNI) in 2019. This memorandum surveys U.S. economic sanctions and anti-money laundering ("AML") developments and trends in 2022 and provides an outlook for 2023. Office for National Statistics technical assistance to build capacity of statistical systems in developing countries. It also includes a summary of the government's current international development strategy and commentary on some of the issues affecting UK aid spending. Its worth noting that, like other multilateral organisations, core contributions to IDA are based on multi-year commitments which may not be uniformly spread across years, four of the top 5 receiving organisations of UK multilateral ODA in 2019 were among the top 5 multilaterals in 2018. The country names and numbers inside each bar are how the rank for that country compared to last year (2018), coloured in red if its decreased (with a red downward pointing arrow), green if its increased (with a green upward pointing arrow) and black if its unmoving (with black horizontal pointing arrow). This drop in ODA, moved Nigeria from being the third largest recipient of UK country-specific bilateral ODA in 2018 to fifth in 2019 (Figure 7), Nigerias lowest position in 5 years. Rep.) remains a top 10 recipient of UK bilateral ODA after entering in 2018 due to the increase in Humanitarian Aid spend, which has been the highest sector spend in the country for the last 3 years, South Sudan became a top 10 recipient of UK bilateral ODA in 2019 due to the increase in Health spend, which became the highest spend sector in the country in 2019, while Humanitarian Aid had been the highest sector for the previous 5 years, the amount of UK ODA to the top 5 multilaterals represented 68.7% of total multilateral ODA in 2019. Its activities include, among others, primary education, basic health services, clean water and sanitation, agriculture, business climate improvements, infrastructure, and institutional reforms. The central theme of 2022 was the U.S. government's deploying of its sanctions, AML . After final decisions on UK ODA spending are made the GNI estimate can still shift due to later economic data for the year becoming available, so can the amount of ODA spent by other government departments and ODA contributions from non-departmental sources. EU attribution fluctuates from year to year in part because the EU works on a 7 year programming cycle and so EU disbursements in a given year can vary. View full size version of infographic: In 2019 the UK provided 15.2bn of Official Development Assistance. , Statistics on International Development, Final UK Aid Spend, 2019, p. 18, Figure 5, Figure 18 is based on the provisional 2019 ODA data from all 29 DAC member countries, except the UK for which final 2019 ODA data is used. Publication of the FCDO's monthly programme data will resume as soon as the system changes have completed. Figure 7 legend: Top 10 Recipients of UK 2019 Bilateral ODA[footnote 14]. Figure 2 legend: Total UK ODA by main delivery channel. 4 minutes read. Multisector/Cross-Cutting - 1,325 million (12.9%). Figure 18 legend: Top 15 recipient countries of total ODA from the DAC donor countries in 2018 and the UKs share of ODA in these recipient countries (orange) compared to other DAC countries ODA share (blue). While Ukraine has been able to acquire a variety of modern weapons from the U.S. and Europe, few countries have been willing to d. 17 hours ago. The estimate in 2018 and 2019 is based on published data from the European Commission on the UKs share of development expenditure. The analysis in this chapter is based on provisional[footnote 21] 2019 ODA data from all 29 Development Assistance Committee (DAC) member countries[footnote 22] except the UK, for which final 2019 ODA data is used. For further information on development issues and FCDO policies, please contact the Public Enquiry Point on 020 7008 5000. 2019: Europe received 189 million of UK bilateral ODA in 2019, a decrease of 6 million compared to the previous year (Figure 4). Germany followed with over . This is the estimate for the non-DFID share of the EU ODA budget. For comparability, UK ODA data by recipient countries is also for 2018. According to the OECD analysis of donors provisional 2019 ODA spend, the increase is attributable to bilateral aid to low income countries rising[footnote 23]. DITs ODA is administrative costs to support ODA capability and compliance. Further information on the technical terms, data sources, quality and processing of the statistics in this publication are found in Annexes 1-3 on the Statistics on International Development webpage. Table 4. It covers the total amount of UK ODA spent in 2019, the calculation of the ODA:GNI ratio, longer-term spending trends, breakdowns of UK ODA spend by main delivery channel, and by Government Departments and other contributors. Other major changes in top 10 country-specific rankings, Figure 7: Rank of top 10 recipients of country-specific 2019 UK bilateral ODA. However, a closer examination of recent trends and the latest federal budget reveals a grimmer picture. Budget Review 2020-21 Index. See the case study in SID 2018 (p. 34) for more information on Developing country, unspecified ODA. For the 2019 ODA:GNI ratio, the GNI estimate is based on the pre-Blue Book 2019 framework since the first quarterly estimate of 2019 GNI under the new framework did not become available until 30 September 2019. By Jennifer Scott, political reporter. Tied Aid: The receiving country accepts aid with the expectation that it is spent in the lending country. There are two types of bilateral ODA: Core multilateral ODA is un-earmarked funding from national governments to multilateral organisations[footnote 4], which are pooled with other donors funding and disbursed as part of the core budget of the multilateral organisation[footnote 5]. Figure 2: Total UK ODA by main delivery channel (%), 2015-2019. Seven of the top ten country-specific ODA increases from 2018 were seen in LDC/Other LICs (Yemen, Bangladesh, South Sudan, Uganda, Afghanistan, Mozambique and Zambia), LDCs and Other LICs continue to account for the largest proportion of bilateral country-specific ODA spend in 2019 at 56.4%, UK ODA to LMICs represented 29.7 per cent (1,488m) of UK country specific bilateral ODA in 2019, compared to 32.3% (1,458m) in 2018, total UK bilateral ODA received by UMICs increased by 136 million to 694 million in 2019. The dark blue section represents the proportion of total UK ODA delivered through Other Bilateral channels. The risk of input error is relatively low for estimates of total spend, and by country/region, and relatively higher for spending by sector (where there is sometimes ambiguity, especially for projects or programmes that cut across sectors) and by funding channel. Japan - Japan is the largest contributor to foreign aid in Asia. Figure 14 provides an overview of the highest spending sector for each of the top 10 recipient countries of UK bilateral ODA in 2019. Ethiopia was the largest among the African countries and second overall with around US$417 million. Because the UK economy is set to get bigger over the next few years the real value of development aid spending is expected to increase. We use some essential cookies to make this website work. This sector has seen the largest increase in 2019 compared to 2018 - 237 million more than in 2018. The Prime Minister will walk into the G7 summit as the only leader who is cutting development aid to the world's poorest. Dont worry we wont send you spam or share your email address with anyone. Liz Truss under pressure to find savings across Whitehall as she tries to control spending and reduce debt after her tax-cutting mini-Budget. Additional Tables and Annexes are available. Bilateral ODA to Europe has increased from 55 million in 2015 to 189 million in 2019. UK foreign aid spending in 2021/22. ODA spend allocated to Africa increased by 125 million increase in 2019 to 2,989 million, whilst the percentage share remained similar to the share in 2018 (50.6%), (Figure 4). Information on the main definitions and sources used in this publication can be found in Annexes 2 and 3 respectively of the Statistics on International Development publication. Conflict, Stability and Security Fund (CSSF). The size of the dots corresponds to the total amount of ODA spent in each income groups sector. This is an increase in spend (5,659m in 2018) but a decrease in terms of percentage share from 2018 (61.3% in 2018). This share was still below the 2017 level of 28.1%, of the non-DFID contributors, Other Government Departments (OGDs) ODA accounted for 22.4% of total UK ODA, their largest share over the last 10 years. Most policymakers understand that foreign assistance is a key instrument of U.S. foreign policy, but they also need to recognize that disruptions . Figure 3 legend: A) Percentage of UK ODA spend by DFID, Other Government Departments (OGDs) and Other UK Contributors (Other Contributors) in 2015 (dark blue), 2018 (light blue) and 2019 (grey). Britain still gives mega-rich China 51.7million in foreign aid despite promises to end the handouts. Non-departmental ODA, for example Gift Aid claimed by charities carrying out ODA eligible activities and spend by Devolved Administrations, contributed 692 million in 2019, approximately the same compared to 2018. In 2016, the UK spent 13.4 billion on overseas aid, in line with the 0.7% target. See Annex 1 for more information on what is included in each sector level. Figure 5 legend: World Map coloured by amount of bilateral ODA spend in recipient country ( million) in 2019. The ODA:GNI commitment of 0.7% was first agreed internationally in 1970 by the United Nations General Assembly. FCDO will move to the new framework at the start of 2020, the next full calendar year, for managing and reporting 2020 ODA spend. It supports them to deal with the impacts of climate change by building their capacity to act themselves and by catalysing large scale public and private finance investments. Canada has been a global laggard in terms of aid generosity and . In 2019, 659 million was delivered through the fund, an increase of 54 million compared to 2018. Uses of Foreign Aid. Figure 8: Country-specific bilateral ODA by Income Group, 2009-2019. There are 2 main delivery channels for ODA: bilateral and multilateral (Figure 2). Over 5 years: Increasing from 2015, spend to Asia reached a peak in 2016 before steadily falling by 109 million to 2,235 million in 2018. Information on this spend can be found in the Office for National Statistics Living costs and Food Survey or the Charities Aid Foundations UK giving report. For the first time since 2014, there was no core contribution to the IMF-Poverty Reduction Growth Trust. Funding on research activities increased by 90 million while spending on climate-related programmes increased by 20 million, the Cross-Government Prosperity Fund spent 176 million of ODA in 2019, this was an increase of 83 million, or 88.3%, on 2018. When DFID or other UK government departments provide core funding to multilateral organisations, the funding is pooled with other donors funding and disbursed as part of the core budget of the multilaterals. Government departments other than FCDO will provide project-level details that allow the ODA spend to be quality assured by FCDO statisticians. DEFRAs ODA programming supports the delivery of all four UK Aid Strategy objectives by strengthening global peace, security and governance, strengthening resilience and response to crises, promoting Global Prosperity and tackling extreme poverty and helping the worlds most vulnerable. Despite the slight downward trend since 2015, spend is still higher than in 2012, spend to Afghanistan has fluctuated over the last 10 years. Table 4 shows multilateral UK ODA in 2015, 2018 and 2019 by government agency and delivery channel i.e. The government's decision to cut aid spending [makes it] the only G7 country to do so. In-donor spend on support to asylum seekers and the resettlement of vulnerable people. This support relates to the provision of publicly-funded education services for asylum seekers of compulsory school age. This followed a peak in 2017 as a result of high levels of humanitarian aid. Figure 12 legend: Major Sector Spend comparison between 2018 and 2019 bilateral ODA ( millions). For example, the International Development Association (IDA), which is part of the World Bank Group, has been one of the largest recipients of UK multilateral ODA since 2013 and the UK remains its biggest donor. This information is primarily inputted by spending teams in DFID country offices and central departments, with some quality assurance carried out at input and centrally to ensure that spend is in line with OECD definitions of ODA ii) Other Government Departments and contributors some of which have similar databases to record ODA transaction data. In 2018, there was 4 million of Debt Relief. A small proportion of non-DFID spend is estimated, for example Gift Aid on ODA eligible activity. This was an increase of 83 million compared to 2018, reflecting increased spending by FCO and DFID. U.S. Foreign Assistance by Country. The lighter blue represents the same measure but for ODA delivered through the Bilateral through Multilateral channel. For example, Afghanistan in 2018 was in 4th position, and in 2019 is in 3rd position (a change of +1). View full size version of infographic: Case Study 1 - Yemen. For more detail on the grant-equivalent impact on other donors see Final SID 2018. For the departmental breakdown see Table 4b. bilateral ODA accounted for 67.5% of total UK 2019 ODA. The ONS publishes revisions to GNI estimates as more economic data becomes available. This shift in share was in part driven by the decrease seen in the UKs core contributions to multilaterals as well as the actual increase in bilateral ODA spend. Table 3: Top Twenty Recipients of UK Core Funding to Multilateral Organisations - Multilateral ODA 2018 and 2019 UK Official Development Assistance (ODA) spend was 15,197 million, an increase of 645 million (4.4% increase) on 2018, UK bilateral ODA spend was 10,258 million (67.5% of total UK ODA) while UK core funding to multilaterals was 4,939 million (32.5% of total UK ODA), DFID spent 11,107 million of ODA in 2019. Compared with 2015, the percentage share of DFIDs region-specific bilateral ODA received by Africa has slightly decreased (by 3.3 percentage points) and the share received by Asia has slightly increased (by 2.2 percentage points). In 2021, about 743 million pounds was spent on humanitarian assistance such as disaster relief, a . Foreign aid could be slashed to balance the books. Humanitarian Aid - 1,536 million (15.0% of total UK bilateral ODA). Pension payments made to ex-members of the UK Overseas Civil Service who were employed directly by developing country governments. 2019: Bilateral ODA to Africa increased by 125 million from 2,863 million in 2018 to 2,989 million in 2019, increasing by 4.4% (Figure 4). If you require any other data or information, or if you have any thoughts about how to improve the publication, please contact the statistics team at: statistics@fcdo.gov.uk. From 2018 onwards, ODA has changed from being measured on a cash basis to being measured on a grant equivalent basis, following a decision taken by the DAC in 2014[footnote 3]. This administrative source comprises 73.1% of total UK ODA in 2019, non-DFID sources, who also assess whether the spend is in line with the OECD definitions of ODA. Through its donor contributions, IDA aims to reduce poverty by providing concessional loans and grants for programs that boost economic growth, reduce inequalities, and improve peoples living condition. Different world regions are on the x-axis (Africa, Americas, Asia, Europe, Pacific). The UK provided the largest share of total DAC donor ODA to Pakistan (34%), three of the top 15 DAC ODA recipients received 5 per cent or less of their total ODA from the UK. This publication is available at https://www.gov.uk/government/statistics/statistics-on-international-development-final-uk-aid-spend-2019/statistics-on-international-development-final-uk-aid-spend-2019. Income groups: DFID - non-DFID comparison 2019, Figure 9: Breakdown of country-specific bilateral ODA by Income Group, 2019. The GNI used to calculate the ODA:GNI ratio for 2019 is based on the pre-2019 Blue Book methodology. For a full breakdown of UK-ODA by government department and other contributors to UK ODA by delivery channel for 2015, 2018 and 2019 please see Table 10. This could have an impact on the recent trends of some recipient countries. The data used for ODA flows by recipient countries is for 2018. For information on the work of the UK Statistics Authority visit: https://www.statisticsauthority.gov.uk/. Aid spending was an estimated 3 billion lower in 2021 than 2020 (14.5 billion versus 11.5 Core contributions to multilateral organisations: A full breakdown of UK ODA by Government Department and Other Contributors of UK ODA and delivery channel in 2015, 2018 and 2019 is available online in Table 10. The introduction of the grant-equivalent[footnote 24] measure in 2018 primarily affects countries with a high proportion of loans in their 2019 ODA portfolio. Spend in Pakistan was mainly focused on Education (38.4%) as well as Government and Civil Society (16.4%) (see Section 4.2.3 for more information on sector specific breakdowns), Ethiopia has remained the second largest recipient of bilateral ODA although spend slightly decreased in 2019 from 2018 - a decrease of 2 million. [footnote 19]. The note sets out plans to discontinue the publication of the GPEX suite of tables due to (i) low public usage and (ii) being able to meet the main known needs by adding 3 pilot summary tables to Statistics on International Development (SID). This spending is helping developing countries reduce their emissions in line with the ambition set out in the Paris Agreement. Non-DFID contributors also spent a larger proportion of their ODA in Europe and the Americas (19.9%), compared to DFID (2.8%). BEISs ODA includes spend on International Climate Finance, jointly managed with FCDO and DEFRA. The Government also announced a one-off supplement of $304.7 million for the COVID-19 response in the Pacific and Timor . FCO remained the largest spender of CSSF ODA funds, (69.1% of total CSSF ODA). Dark blue = LDCs/Other LICs (Least Developed Countries/Other Low Income Countries), light blue = LMICs (Lower Middle Income Countries), grey = UMICs (Upper Middle Income Countries). Following the merger, the ODA statistics team will review the SID in light of this, including how to present and communicate ODA trends for reporting on 2020 ODA and beyond. The bars for each year represent 100% of total UK ODA spend. Ed Miliband, 9 June 2021. DWP pays an annual core contribution to the International Labour Organisation (ILO). Figures released by the Foreign Office yesterday revealed that China . Department for Digital, Culture, Media and Sport (DCMS). The amount spent on aid also fell in 2020 due to the contraction of the economy, equivalent to around . The British government has ended direct bilateral aid to more than 100 countries and territories, according to a Devex analysis of a letter written by Foreign Secretary Dominic Raab. Almost 25% of that budget has gone to just ten countries: Ethiopia ($1.13 billion) Jordan ($1.03 billion) Afghanistan . UK ODA spend includes DFID spend, ODA spend by government departments other than DFID and other sources of ODA (such as EU attribution and Gift Aid). The Scottish Government, though its 10M pa International Development Fund, supports development work in its partner countries Malawi, Zambia, Rwanda and Pakistan, in pursuit of the Global Goals. The entirety . In 2015 the International Development (Official Development Assistance Target) Act placed the 0.7% commitment in UK law from 2015 and in each subsequent calendar year. In a calendar year, FCDO and HM Treasury will monitor spend by other departments and funds, and movements in GNI during the year[footnote 28]. The Office for National Statistics (ONS) implemented a new methodology for calculating GDP in its September 2019 Blue Book (the UK National Account statistics), that in turn had an impact on Gross National Income (GNI). As part of his spending review, chancellor Rishi Sunak has announced a cut to the UK's foreign aid budget, which will be reduced from 2021 from 0.7% of gross national income to 0.5%.. Figure 4: UK Bilateral ODA by receiving region ( millions), 2009-2019. Education (for compulsory school age) and healthcare for asylum seekers based in Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland. Ian Blackford, 9 June 2021. It will take only 2 minutes to fill in. Figure 13: Bilateral ODA by Government Department and Major Sector, 2019. Former international development secretary Andrew Mitchell has tabled an amendment . The Statistics on International Development: Provisional Aid Spend 2019 publication outlines provisional ODA spend information and an estimate of GNI for 2019 published by ONS in March to calculate a provisional estimate of the ODA:GNI ratio. The same countries also met or exceeded the target in 2018. It includes all low, lower-middle and upper-middle income countries, except for those that are members of the G8 or the European Union (including countries with a firm accession date for EU membership). The most significant reduction was seen in Turkey (16.3m decrease since 2018) reversing previous increases in funding (2016 and 2017) to support displaced refugees during the Syria Crisis. The Central Emergency Response Fund is now in the top 5 recipients of UK multilateral ODA, DFID also provided the majority of the UKs core multilateral ODA, accounting for 81.9% (4,043m), a decrease on 2018 when DFID accounted for 85.5% (4,544m), BEIS was the largest non-DFID department to provide core multilateral ODA in 2019, accounting for 3.4% (167m), this includes their core contribution to the Clean Technology Fund (166.5m), over the last 5 years, the share of UK core funding to multilateral organisations from non-DFID contributors has fallen from 21.6% (967m) in 2015 to 18.1% (896m) in 2019. Overall there has been a steady increase in the amount of UK ODA since 1970, with a spike in 2005 and 2006 which was driven by high levels of debt relief[footnote 2], and then a steep increase in 2013 (by 2.6 bn) when the UK Government first met the 0.7% ODA:GNI commitment. Compared to 2018, Government and Civil Society had an increased spend of 118 million in 2019, with the majority of this coming from DFID (90m). The government reduced its annual aid budget from 0.7% of gross national income (GNI), which is a measure of the amount produced by the economy, to 0.5% this year. Total bilateral aid commitments to Ukraine 2022-2023, by country and type. The House of Lords will hold a debate on the subject on 15 December 2022. Charities accuse chancellor of stealth raid on aid. The Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office said in a statement that Britain spent more than 11 billion in aid in 2021 and to date has invested 4.4 billion to fight H.I.V., tuberculosis . The strategy is published in the context of reduced UK aid spending and the Government's wider foreign policy intentions to increase UK efforts in Africa and the Indo-Pacific, partly in response to China. UK ODA spend figures for this publication are derived from: DFIDs ARIES database of financial transactions relating to DFID payments and receipts, which is quality assured centrally to ensure that data is complete, coding is correct and spend is in line with OECD definitions of ODA. The nation paid 1 out of every 8 in foreign aid given by 29 major countries, figures reveal. As a percent of . These extra details allow the ODA spend to be quality assured using guidance from OECD. Total ODA from DAC country donors in 2019 was 119.7 billion (grant-equivalent measure), an increase from 115.1 billion in 2018. Programmes involved providing humanitarian assistance such as immediate relief and emergency food, Nigeria saw the largest decrease in bilateral ODA compared to all other recipients, with spend decreasing from 297 million in 2018 to 258 million in 2019 (the next largest decrease was Pakistan by 26m). Figure 14: Bilateral ODA by largest Major Sector for the top 10 country-specific ODA recipients, 2019. This represents 0.5% of expected gross national income (GNI) and is a reduction in aid spending from the legislative target of 0.7%. The majority of non-DFID country-specific ODA was channelled to Middle Income Countries 71.5% (440m to LMICs and 412m to UMICs), LDCs and Other LICs received 339 million of non-DFID bilateral ODA in 2019, this was an increase of 112 million compared to 2018. Figure 3 (and Table 2) shows 2019 ODA spend by government department and other contributors of UK ODA, as well as changes in ODA spend from 2018. In the Blue Book 2019, the ONS implemented a major new methodology framework for GDP, which in turn had a sizable impact on GNI. In 2019, 57.6% (5,908m) of the UKs bilateral ODA was allocated to a specific country or region. Dont include personal or financial information like your National Insurance number or credit card details. A glossary, explaining key terms used throughout this report, is available in Annex 1, See commitments made by the UK and other donors at the 2005 G8 Summit in Gleneagles, For more information on the grant equivalent measure and the impact on UK ODA, see background note 6.2, The multilateral must be on the OECD DAC list of eligible multilaterals in order to receive unearmarked funding. Whilst the majority of funding is delivered via multi-year programmes or spending commitments, each year the CSSF reviews its spending via the allocations process. Non-DFID EU contributions include ODA eligible spend in peace, security, democracy, human rights and civil society. The first table is based on official development assistance (ODA) figures published by the OECD for members of its Development Assistance Committee (DAC). Bilateral ODA includes spend to specific countries or regions (sections 4.1.1-4.1.4) as well as spend to multiple countries and/or regions[footnote 10]. This is similar to 2017, of the 5 countries receiving the greatest amount of total DAC donor ODA (Afghanistan, Syria, India, Bangladesh and Ethiopia), three (Ethiopia, Afghanistan and Syria) were among the top five recipients of UK ODA. The countries within the top 10 remained unchanged from 2018[footnote 25].

Shahidah Omar Daughter, Marcus Spears Daughter Volleyball, Articles U